Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3240 37,789 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Memory 69.6 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 160 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 232 30% 229 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 17A0) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 174 151 152 151 152 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.4% Good	Read 238 Write 239 Mixed 220 SusWrite 170 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 47.3 4K Mixed 34.2 111% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 464GB free Firmware: HP73 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 130 129 130 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 89.9 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 129 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 4JTF25664AZ-1G6E1 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.5% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	97x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	91x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	7x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	5x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	5x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59