ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30B7S0MD00

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30B7S0MD00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 1030
Memory	54.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180305
Uptime	15.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '20 at 14:12
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4 112 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	47% Average	Memory 52.3 1-Core 55.3 2-Core 103 42% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 444 39% 334 Pts	64-Core 633 39% 633 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 22.3 Parallax 26.6 27% 27.3 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 33.1 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4133101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 189 190 192 200 193 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 420 Write 406 Mixed 276 SusWrite 196 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 30.4 111% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 219 184% 270 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 200 197 202 200 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 146 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 199 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A4K40BB1-CRC 2x31.5GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 12 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.5 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback