Chuwi Herobox

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi Herobox (all builds)
Motherboard	IP3 GB3
Memory	4.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200610
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 17:29
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Memory 41 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 99.4 36% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 153 24% 174 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.52 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 58 57 111 41 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	Read 319 Write 296 Mixed 285 SusWrite 116 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 92%
Intel SSDSCKKF180H6H 180GB 517 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 53GB free Firmware: LSF034N SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 81 91 81 82 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 312 Write 298 Mixed 288 SusWrite 97.7 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 29 103% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 243 178% 236 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.6 3.6 4.5 4.2 4.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 4.2 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 2.1 104% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3 4 2.8 4.2 3.5 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.3 9% 9.15 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.5 160% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 18%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 22GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 19 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 19.3 27% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 104% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 41%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 103GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.9 8.6 6.4 7.2 7.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	7.9% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 7.5 16% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 7.9% Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 69GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 13 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 11.2 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.2 108% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 35%
SDXC Card 64GB 12,175 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 20GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 35.9 Mixed 23.4 31% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.8 211% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
mSD Card 394GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 199GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 23 23 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.1% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 31.8 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 22.6 39% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.2 156% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB 5,404 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Herobox Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Chuwi Herobox

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	68x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	36x
N100IntelBench 50%, 2,388 samples	12x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	112x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 2,359 samples	12x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	9x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	41x
S535N8/256GYN 256GBNetacBench 60%, 120 samples	12x
RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 68%, 456 samples	12x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	68x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	35x
4x2GBSamsungBench 30%, 383 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363