Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Blade Pro
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 06 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 54.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 180
55% 102 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 498
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1A58 674C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 5.06
3% 6.82 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.74
4% 4.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 71 61 67 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 387
Write 245
Mixed 158
SusWrite 72.3
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 15.8
61% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 65.1
90% 169 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: GR2OA230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 101 106 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 90.5
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 105
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback