Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 07 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 149
55% 97 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 213
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 28
Parallax 33.7
30% 32.7 fps
MRender 20.4
Gravity 35.1
Splatting 33.2
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 91 54 42 58 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 342
Write 335
Mixed 106
SusWrite 74.1
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 9.1
61% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 104
123% 214 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
155GB free
Firmware: 0K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 86 54 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 68.9
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 72.5
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback