Asus N56VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N56VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56VM
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120301
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMar 31 '17 at 15:55
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 90
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 430
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Asus(1043 1477) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.94
4% 4.89 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 3.52
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE4OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 79.4
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.18
50% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 53%
TDK LoR Platinum 3.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 069c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 147
Write 33.7
Mixed 42.6
73% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.95
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.66
79% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56VM Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback