Hasee N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHasee N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 11 '20 at 06:50
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 379
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison SATA SSD 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 39 36 29 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 451
Write 59.2
Mixed 103
SusWrite 44
35% 164 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 6.8
58% 14 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 13 16 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 63.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 14.3
22% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.4
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Hasee N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback