QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 21:00
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 71.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 299
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,042
98% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,362
84% 1,362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$267
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 111
Parallax 100
89% 107 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 81.3
80% 100 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 273 274 279 276 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 350
Write 402
Mixed 357
SusWrite 274
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 22.1
74% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.8
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 96
75% 103 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 31.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 29.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback