Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '20 at 02:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 145
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.15% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 11.8
8% 8.7 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 9.57
Splatting 8.61
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon S930 128 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 144 144 143 145 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 431
Write 145
Mixed 194
SusWrite 143
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 18.7
82% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 149
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
387GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 63 65 66 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 61.8
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 64.1
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback