| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock B365M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190515 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '20 at 20:09 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
86% 152 Pts
|
73% 577 Pts
|
42% 673 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Palit(1569 1381) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.38
|
14.4%
Very poor
|
14% 15.9 fps
|
15% 18.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 58 53 29 48 40 MB/s
|
34.8%
Below average
|
33% 151 MB/s
|
52% 21.5 MB/s
|
17% 35.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
50GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 60 61 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
43% 58.6 MB/s
|
176% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B365M Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,406 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B365M Pro4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,207x |
| Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 513x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 488x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 299x |
| RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 276x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 237x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $524 |