Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5733Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5733Z  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5733Z
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '20 at 02:47
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
44% 73 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 98.2
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Acer(1025 0601) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2182
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.84
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.09 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 28 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 15.8
Write 26
Mixed 13
SusWrite 31.5
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 47%
Seagate ST9640423AS 640GB
564GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 76 81 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47% Average
Read 83
Write 55.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 80.9
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZPHSCR M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.3
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5733Z Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5733Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback