Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 12 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 46.8 1-Core 33.3 2-Core 65.9 31% 48.7 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 130 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 21GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 18GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.16% Terrible	Read 124 Write 57.1 Mixed 67 SusWrite 16.9 15% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 4% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 7.16% Great: 51%
Xensrc PVDISK 81GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.3% Average	Read 148 Write 68 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 16.3 56% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x7GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 10.8 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	8x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	2x

SSD
G5 BICS4 500GBSandiskBench 89%, 7,142 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	3x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-YH9 8x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 124 samples	7x
M392B1K70CM0-CH9 16x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 4 samples	3x
9965516-130.A00LF 4x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 7 samples	3x

Value: 124% - Outstanding

Total price: $195