Today's hottest deals

ECS MCP61M-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS MCP61M-M3  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 13:29
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 86.4
47% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 87.5
8-Core 79
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 88
5% 88 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Nvidia(10DE 0648) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 0.84
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 80 97 95 80 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 114
Write 101
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 84.3
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 99P5471-002.A01LF 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback