Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory32.6 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 26 '20 at 19:36
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 260
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 801
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 192
Parallax 179
184% 199 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 177
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 148%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$200
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 327 307 301 297 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,300
Mixed 730
SusWrite 382
220% 992 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 53
189% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 790
591% 792 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 179%
Great: 302%
Corsair Force GT 480GB-$299
267GB free
Firmware: 5.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 276 286 281 265 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 428
Write 310
Mixed 314
SusWrite 277
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 24.6
84% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 111
96% 146 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK32GX4M2A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2133C13 CMK16GX4M4A2133C13 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 22.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $791
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback