Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	17% Very poor	Memory 24.4 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 35.7 20% 32 Pts	4-Core 54.3 8-Core 65.3 8% 59.8 Pts	64-Core 63.9 4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.02% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.72 0% 0.77 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 4.61 2% 2.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.02% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB 522 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2872101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 130 96 97 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 294 Write 207 Mixed 356 SusWrite 103 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 38.1 4K Mixed 24.5 82% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 110 101% 156 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD 1x4GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.83 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 289 14% 289 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16