Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 740
73% 595 Pts
64-Core 961
60% 961 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 142
Parallax 129
107% 134 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 126
Splatting 103
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 869 868 856 831 817 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,230
Write 1,129
Mixed 1,055
SusWrite 880
241% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 77.3
234% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 883
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 795
587% 777 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 211%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
17GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 331
Mixed 316
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 35.7
137% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 154
170% 287 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
66GB free
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 416 423 347 166 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 353
Mixed 326
SusWrite 324
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 42.5
143% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 154
170% 287 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 45.2
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback