Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20NF0018US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20NF0018US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NF0018US
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 28.5
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 142
42% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 382
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.12.03
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.27
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 4.88
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 3.43
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDHTNG-8510B 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80020C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 308 311 314 319 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 320
Write 297
Mixed 265
SusWrite 312
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 23.3
81% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 420
305% 396 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 149%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$76
929GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 372 374 377 381 382 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 414
Write 359
Mixed 341
SusWrite 374
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 32.3
102% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 178
138% 189 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20NF0018US Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20NF0018US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback