Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 43.3 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 75.4 32% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 72.8 8-Core 74.9 10% 73.9 Pts	64-Core 73.8 5% 73.8 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4749 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 1.34 2% 1.54 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB 1,308 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 83 77 65 67 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 291 Write 128 Mixed 142 SusWrite 77.4 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 8 42% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 68 67% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x8GB 1,334 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.7% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	120x
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	44x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	73x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	48x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	24x

SSD
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GBBench 57%, 1,308 samples	21x
P210 256GBPatriotBench 65%, 5,446 samples	4x
MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,392 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	49x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	31x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	24x