Today's hottest deals

Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNotebook W65KJ1_KK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65KJ1_KK1
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161223
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 22:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 89.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 437
60% 447 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Clevo(1558 651A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8587
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 6.13
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 6.22
5% 14.2 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.09
0% 0.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 396 416 419 417 419 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 375
Mixed 357
SusWrite 403
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.2
160% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 244
197% 274 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 133 132 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 136
Write 139
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 130
139% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65KJ1_KK1 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65KJ1_KK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback