Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Memory 26.5 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 72 26% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 121 15% 115 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.24 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.65 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-512G 512GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 214GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1116A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 40 18 41 39 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 382 Write 336 Mixed 28 SusWrite 56.9 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 13.7 48% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 4 DQ Mixed 19.3 27% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 276 14% 276 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	28x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	2x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	29x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x

SSD
ShanDianZhe-256GB 256GBBench 59%, 101 samples	3x
P3-512 512GBBench 75%, 2,855 samples	3x
ShanDianZhe-128G 128GBBench 48%, 38 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16