Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory42GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 42GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R670-2  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2618-C1
Memory38.5 GB free of 42 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 62
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 153
56% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 584
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 478GB
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 203 119 265 265 3.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 383
Write 363
Mixed 325
SusWrite 186
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 20.4
70% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.7
DQ Write 96.8
DQ Mixed 21.5
36% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
6GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 74 73 72 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.2
Write 62.6
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 71.7
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
4GB free
Firmware: HP64
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.5
Write 70.8
Mixed 49.2
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 598GB
357GB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 291 297 294 292 305 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.9 1.8 1.8 2 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 3.8
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 1.7
7% 6.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 42GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R670-2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R670-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback