Asus M2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2V  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '20 at 18:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
SOCKET AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 33.5
2-Core 29.6
39% 48.8 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 58.2
7% 54.8 Pts
64-Core 68.6
4% 68.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
AMD(1002 0B42) 512MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 1.22
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.56 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST1OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 26 53 57 66 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 8.8
Write 11.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 40.4
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2V Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback