| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus B150M-A/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160506 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 25 '20 at 04:52 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | ISR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.3%
Very good
|
73% 127 Pts
|
48% 359 Pts
|
24% 381 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
|
18%
Very poor
|
18% 20.3 fps
|
18% 22.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KINGSTON 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA
|
36% 164 MB/s
|
128% 50.1 MB/s
|
69% 99.3 MB/s
| |
|
Ts256gss D230S 256GB
93GB free
Firmware: R042
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 419 412 422 424 410 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
95% 422 MB/s
|
185% 67.5 MB/s
|
169% 235 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
237GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 110 111 111 111 MB/s
|
79.1%
Very good
|
101% 137 MB/s
|
240% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.1%
Good
|
69% 24 GB/s
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
53% 75.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B150M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,440 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus B150M-A/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 266x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $219Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 259x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $71Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 173x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 223x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 147x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $273 |