ADD TO PC
BUILD

Mousecomputer/81 A78M-S01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Mousecomputer/81 A78M-S01 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer A78M-S01
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150305
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '20 at 05:56
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 56.7 2-Core 104 46% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 174 22% 170 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% MSI(1462 7721) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 11.6 6% 8.71 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 8.63 Splatting 8.04 6% 7.61 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500412AS 500GB 3,833 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 402GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 29 41 85 95 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 65 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 69 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$79 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 174 182 179 179 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 150 Write 136 Mixed 119 SusWrite 175 107% 145 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.9 388% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLH-16GK 2x8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.7% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 13 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.9 20% 7.07 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback