Eluktronics MAX-17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemEluktronics MAX-17  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics Standard
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 00:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 145
53% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 153
19% 143 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 41%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 108B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4253
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 11.6
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 15.2
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PRO-X-4000GB-G2R 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 613 639 562 758 1060 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 1,122
Mixed 957
SusWrite 700
217% 966 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 32.5
74% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 529
DQ Write 70.2
DQ Mixed 50.2
100% 216 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
MENTAL32G3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 13.4
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX-17 Builds (Compare 229 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics MAX-17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback