Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-A/M.2
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 00:01
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 187
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 324
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 65.3
58% 68.2 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 66.7
55% 67 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 287 118 191 138 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 452
Write 351
Mixed 302
SusWrite 177
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 39.3
143% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 270
189% 237 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 159 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 164
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 160
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.6
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback