Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '20 at 10:26
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 170 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 600 57% 471 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 46.4 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 38.9 38% 39 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 0.13 19% 26.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB 12,396 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 627GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 361 361 363 359 364 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 407 Mixed 264 SusWrite 362 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 79.2 4K Mixed 40 126% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 299 DQ Mixed 185 179% 283 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 118%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 231GB free Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 204 206 212 204 204 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	96.3% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 435 Mixed 329 SusWrite 234 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 45.1 156% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 132 153% 264 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 96.3% Great: 105%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 221GB free Firmware: 0C3G37R5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 143 108 111 108 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 468 Write 400 Mixed 199 SusWrite 146 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 74.2 4K Mixed 41 142% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 82.4 119% 222 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 88%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 500GB 4,692 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 303GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 136 138 139 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 370 Write 362 Mixed 229 SusWrite 137 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 25.9 86% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 57.8 64% 106 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 83%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 250GB 837 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 220GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 137 139 140 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 304 Write 196 Mixed 267 SusWrite 138 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 17.6 74% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 77.8 73% 114 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 754GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 166 165 166 166 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 170 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 165 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 4TB 255 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 135 137 138 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	62% Good	Read 212 Write 209 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 134 206% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 89%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 2 4.3 8.2 7.1 8.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4.7 Write 0.3 SusWrite 5.7 4% 3.57 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB 49,673 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	68% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 20.6 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	321x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	283x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	140x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	137x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	105x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	74x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	59x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $701

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16