Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TS44HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS44HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 118
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 125
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Acer(1025 0512) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.25% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.15
Parallax 0.91
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 2.87
2% 3.01 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.25%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 45 49 53 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 78.8
Write 79.5
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 48.9
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
SDXC Card 134GB
97GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 5
Write 20.2
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 21.3
20% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 2.4
221% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS44HR Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS44HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback