Today's hottest deals

Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 12:26
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 182
65% 140 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 497
51% 409 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 61% Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 87.9
83% 93.6 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 77.6
73% 91.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 240 230 221 224 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67% Good
Read 257
Write 244
Mixed 236
SusWrite 228
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 192
144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
45GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 239 238 240 240 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.9% Good
Read 255
Write 243
Mixed 247
SusWrite 237
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 34.3
111% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 173
134% 183 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 125%
GB0750C4414 750GB
188GB free
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 48.9
Write 26.7
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 28.6
25% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 2,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback