Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 01:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 229
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 300
37% 282 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.5% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 51.2
46% 53.5 fps
MRender 44
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 49.3
40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 422
Write 364
Mixed 227
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 8
56% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 61.9
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 18.3
30% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
498GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 128 133 136 140 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 139
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 129
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 500GB
304GB free, PID 01c5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 41.8
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 41.6
52% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E84-2666E 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback