ADD TO PC
BUILD

Sony SVE1713G1EW

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Sony SVE1713G1EW (all builds)
Motherboard	Sony VAIO
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120313
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 12:04
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 70.6 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 132 58% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 199 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AC) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.42% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 5.69 Parallax 4.53 5% 5.31 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.42% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 197 206 208 209 208 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 425 Write 392 Mixed 335 SusWrite 218 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 16.9 71% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 34.6 75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 71%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 550GB free Firmware: LVD3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 82 82 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 51.8 Write 86.3 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 82 45% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.8 336% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-004.A03LF 2x4GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 18.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback