Lenovo 20FAS1PP02

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FAS1PP02  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS1PP02
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 09:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 141
57% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 239
32% 241 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 58%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 6.03
5% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 248GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M150821
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 331 331 342 342 343 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 328
Write 332
Mixed 280
SusWrite 335
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 32.9
109% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 188
167% 251 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 19.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback