HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EF
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 20:28
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 94
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 622
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 26.20.100.7757
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.53% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 8.25
6% 9.11 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MX MAS090x SSD 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: H181025
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 439 397 399 388 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 372
Mixed 321
SusWrite 413
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 46.7
153% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 229
183% 260 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 24.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA) Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G4 DM (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback