Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_F512FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_F512FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FA
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 22:27
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 525
56% 446 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 16F1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 7.1
5% 6 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 12.8
8% 9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T1R0B-68A4Z0 1TB
659GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411000WR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 385 417 392 404 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 366
Write 391
Mixed 280
SusWrite 393
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 28.8
92% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 238
203% 298 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 075D GR2666S464L19S/8G 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_F512FA Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FA_F512FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback