HP Pavilion 13 x2 PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion 13 x2 PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21A8
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 22:38
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-1450 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 41.8
1-Core 16
2-Core 30.9
21% 29.6 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 53.7
7% 52.8 Pts
64-Core 51.8
3% 51.8 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 8250
HP(103C 21A8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.7 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAT128MAZ-1AE1ZABHA 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 163 170 170 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 363
Write 175
Mixed 206
SusWrite 166
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 18.9
70% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 81.6
64% 87 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 130 130 130 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 114
Write 109
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 128
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 71%
SDHC Card 32GB
17GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 17
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 15.9
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.4
251% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1MS 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 4.2
11% 3.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 13 x2 PC Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 13 x2 PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback