Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 05:46
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 73%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 56
2-Core 67.3
41% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 190
18% 150 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 108F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5751
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 10.9
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 0.2
6% 8.57 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 70 24 84 23 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 67.8
Write 171
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 58.1
18% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 24.5
88% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 20
78% 172 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71
Write 54.4
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 75.5
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 16.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback