Asus T300FA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus T300FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK T300FA
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20141127
Uptime	29.3 Days
Run Date	May 10 '17 at 16:15
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core M-5Y10 478 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 39 2-Core 70 43% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 91.9 8-Core 97.3 13% 94.6 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300 7,223 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 15FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3939 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 3 Parallax 2.78 2% 2.55 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 3.91 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk i110 64GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: i221000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 263 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1428 (A5) Unknown 100 100 132137 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 33 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 47 244813463599 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 110 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 295 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4749119478 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4116139686	39.3% Below average	Read 439 Write 167 Mixed 234 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 10.5 4K Mixed 4.26 39% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 17.3 DQ Write 11.6 DQ Mixed 5.64 7% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 39%
HGST HTS 545050A7E680 500GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 466GB free, PID 1810 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 102 Write 105 Mixed 91.7 128% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.17 49% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical T300FA Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus T300FA

CPU
Core M-5Y10IntelBench 47%, 478 samples	2x

GPU
Core M HD 5300IntelBench 3%, 7,223 samples	2x

SSD
i110 64GBSandiskBench 34%, 48 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBHynixBench 19%, 8,928 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16