Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H170-PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150709
Uptime	25.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 56.9 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 200 64% 119 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 334 42% 321 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84B5) 1GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 17.2 15% 17.8 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 15.8 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 435 Write 249 Mixed 360 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 51.3 176% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 319 242% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 672GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 120 121 120 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 88.8 Write 95.8 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 119 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 112%
WD WD7500AACS-65D6B 750GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 123GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 39 40 41 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Read 43.1 Write 42.6 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 39.5 28% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47 29,751 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,094x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	284x
Core i5-6402PIntelBench 68%, 15,913 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	273x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	271x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	173x

SSD
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	173x
SP600 128GBAdataBench 73%, 8,600 samples	81x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	295x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 10,940 samples	117x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $462

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16