Today's hottest deals

Asus X71Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X71Q  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X71Q
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090605
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 21:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 43.4
31% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 43.5
8-Core 40.1
6% 41.8 Pts
64-Core 43.2
3% 43.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Asus(1043 1862) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.31% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.31%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$21
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SM28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 78 60 64 29 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 82
Write 81.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 56.2
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.9
222% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 64%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5 5 4.4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Read 24.3
Write 5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.7
10% 10 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
31% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.5
9% 3 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X71Q Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Asus X71Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback