Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 102
53% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 330
32% 265 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
Asus(1043 0421) 1GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 23.3
12% 18.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.8
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 240GB-$110
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 320 312 288 325 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 341
Write 320
Mixed 193
SusWrite 303
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 19.1
79% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 23.5
24% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback