Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GX63VR 7RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P1  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 468
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11F7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7989
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 123
Parallax 7.8
6% 45.9 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
539GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 435 472 462 464 450 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 440
Mixed 424
SusWrite 452
100% 441 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 50.7
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
38GB free
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,430
Write 1,165
Mixed 765
248% 1,120 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 58.8
199% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 748
598% 839 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 419 452 444 445 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 433
Mixed 418
SusWrite 434
99% 437 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 39.9
131% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 340
254% 338 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2800 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 29.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 36.9
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16P1 Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback