HP ProLiant ML350 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350 G5  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090512
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '20 at 11:20
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5405
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 28.8
2-Core 55.4
30% 45.4 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 218
20% 166 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 147GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 90.6
Write 43
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 41.3
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 96%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 2.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 4 3.8 3.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
63GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 107
116% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.54% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.7
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML350 G5 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback