Huanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardHuanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 01:43
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5570-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 130
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 344
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 838C) 1GB
CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 8.97
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 14.5
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 64GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 95.5
Write 78.6
Mixed 91.4
20% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 6.05
32% 9.67 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 9.35
DQ Mixed 5.59
5% 8.48 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
315GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
93GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 MXIC 25L3205 40GB
1333, 33 MHz
4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Huanan To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback