Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 53 1-Core 50 2-Core 96 40% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 156 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1190) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1.8 2% 1.6 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SFSA120GM1AA4TO-I-LB-616-STD 120GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBR11015 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 120 125 108 97 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 378 Write 168 Mixed 146 SusWrite 119 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 13 55% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 168 135% 190 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 9.3 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	63x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	11x
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	45x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	18x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	6x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	21x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	14x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	11x

RAM
2x2GBHynixBench 40%, 7,517 samples	52x
2x2GBMicronBench 23%, 2,546 samples	23x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16