Today's hottest deals

Asus X541NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X541NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541NA
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '22 at 12:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 20.9
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 68.2
23% 42.1 Pts
4-Core 80.1
8-Core 84.8
11% 82.4 Pts
64-Core 81.4
5% 81.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 16A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.8
2% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY28V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 92 113 134 94 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.2% Poor
Read 115
Write 137
Mixed 136
SusWrite 116
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 6.9
38% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 15.9
40% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 314
13% 314 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X541NA Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback