Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '17 at 00:46
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 133
58% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 457
42% 353 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 41.2
41% 46 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37.7
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST5000DM000-1FK1 5TB
356GB free
Firmware: CC48
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 158
Write 180
Mixed 81.6
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 2.56
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 0.7
11% 5 MB/s
DQ Read 36.8
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 0.63
8% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Seagate ST5000DM000-1FK1 5TB
356GB free
Firmware: CC47
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 148
Write 178
Mixed 22.5
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 8.32
4K Write 9.78
4K Mixed 0.43
18% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 1.26
DQ Write 21.2
DQ Mixed 0.86
4% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 498GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 940
Write 966
Mixed 981
216% 962 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 41.5
179% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 67.1
67% 108 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 156%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 14.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback