Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '21 at 21:10
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 216
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 690
66% 546 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 188
Parallax 177
138% 178 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 178
Splatting 125
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,857
Write 5,490
Mixed 4,488
1,107% 4,945 MB/s
4K Read 448
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 267
1,130% 307 MB/s
DQ Read 891
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 660
507% 697 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 179 176 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 175
Mixed 93.8
SusWrite 178
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 106%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
342GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 120 118 118 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 174
Write 138
Mixed 60
SusWrite 119
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.6
438% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 44.7
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 23.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback