| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte H110M-H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180411 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 04 '21 at 03:47 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.8%
Above average
|
66% 111 Pts
|
30% 229 Pts
|
14% 230 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
|
33%
Below average
|
34% 43.9 fps
|
30% 38.4 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
|
3.23%
Terrible
|
3% 2.57 fps
|
4% 5.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 27 8.2 61 63 36 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
52% 236 MB/s
|
54% 18 MB/s
|
45% 74.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
52% 77.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,457 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 723x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 479x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 305x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 453x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 394x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 253x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $123 |