Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 867 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 90 2-Core 173 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 669 60% 508 Pts	64-Core 2,684 166% 2,684 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 9454) 2GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 34.1 13% 24.6 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 35 Splatting 24.8 25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CLR-8W512 512GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 109 112 508 45 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 1,064 Write 88.8 Mixed 732 SusWrite 168 112% 513 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 3.8 118% 52.2 MB/s	DQ Read 456 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 130 136% 235 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 161%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB 1,230 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.9% Good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 22.1 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 127%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM