Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory144GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 144GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory115.2 GB free of 144 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJan 07 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 51
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 160
53% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 605
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,543
104% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 15.3
10% 16.5 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 15
10% 15.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ48 480GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 182 185 183 184 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.9% Above average
Read 245
Write 172
Mixed 206
SusWrite 187
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 24.4
84% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 134
105% 146 MB/s
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$64
1TB free
Firmware: PA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 129 129 129 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 128
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
199% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 87%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$30
8GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 12 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 21.2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 13.1
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
71% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 94%
Corsair Flash Voyager 16GB
15GB free, PID 0ab1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 7.8 7.7 7.7 6.9 7.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
6.31% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 7.2
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.31%
Great: 10%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
60GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 24 24 23 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 19.1
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 22.7
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0... 144GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 33.4
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $400
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback